“9/11” The Biggest Crime Cover Up of the Century

There are many questions about “9/11” that remain unanswered. The resistance of the government to adequately fund and expedite an in depth investigation based on the magnitude of this horrific event also points to “smoking Guns” relating to the strong possibly that the Bush Administration was a major party engineering and executing “9/11”. In any crime one always looks to motive. There are many documented motives: (1) A horrific event to move people into approving the Iraq invasion, (2) Control of Middle East oil and gas reserves, (3) Justification to increase military spending and place more military bases in the Middle East, (4) The PNAC ( Partnership for a New American Century) spearheaded by Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, and Krystol, who’s goal is to have US world domination(Google PNAC to see what they are about).
The families of the victims of “9/11” had to really push hard to get the Bush administration to even investigate “9/11”.
History has revealed many conspiracies by top level leaders to start wars or assassinate top officials. Examples are: Spanish American War, Nazi Blowup of German Government Building, Kennedy Assassination, Gulf of Tonkin Attacks, Cuban “Bay of Pigs”, etc.
Given the credibility gaps of the Bush/Cheney group, one would also have to question the “Government Truth” about the extent of Osama Bin Laden’s sole role in the “9/11” disaster.
40 Unanswered Questions
1. The failure of standard operating (SOP) to intercept American Airlines Flight 11. 8:46 AM AA Flight 11 crashes into WTC North Tower.
2. The failure of SOP to intercept United Airlines Flight 175. 9:03 AM UA Flight 175 crashes into WTC South Tower.
3. The failure of SOP to intercept American Airlines 77 that allegedly hit the Pentagon.
4. The fact that the official story as to these failures changed a few days after “9/11”.
5. The fact that according to this second version of the official story, the order to scramble jet fighters to intercept Flights 11 and 175 went to Otis Air Force base instead of the nearer base, McGuire.
6. The fact that according to this second version of the official story, the order to scramble jet fighters to protect Washington went to Langley Air Force base instead of the nearer base, Andrews.
7. The fact that, even given NORAD’s timeline and the greater distances the pilots had to cover from Otis and Langley, their fighter jets, flying at full speed(1,800 mph), should have reached New York and Washington in time to prevent the attacks on the South Tower and the Pentagon.
8. The fact that according to this second version, the fighter jets that were too late to intercept Flights 11 and 175 were not ordered to Washington, even though it was then known that Flight 77 had been high jacked and, according to the official story, was headed back toward Washington.
9. Secretary of Transportation Mineta’s report of a conversation that may have reflected a stand-down order by Cheney. Cheney was running this “Show”, as “Bush” was just the puppet for appearances.
10. The fact that in New York on 9/11, three steel-framed high rise buildings, for the first time in history, collapsed because of fires - quite localized fires at that, especially in the South Tower and Building 7.
11. The fact that the South Tower fell first even though, according to the hypothesis that the buildings collapsed because of fire, this tower, having been hit second and having the smaller fire, should not have collapsed first.
12. The multiple types of physical evidence that the Twin Towers and Building 7 collapsed by means of controlled demolition. Individuals and fire crews reported the incidence of many explosions. The small dust like size of the debris could only be produced by heavy explosive force. Demolition crews quickly removed the structural steel and shipped it off to foreign scrap yards. Little effort was made to do any forensic testing of the evidence.
13. Larry Silverstein’s (owner of the WTC) statement that he and the fire department decided to “pull” WTC-7, combined with the evidence that the fire department had prior knowledge of its collapse, despite the lack of any physical evidence indicating imminent collapse. This building only had two small fires and came down in free fall within a minute.
14. Mayor Guiliani’s statement that he knew in advance that the Twin Towers were going to collapse.
15. The quick removal of the steel from all three buildings – especially Building 7, where there would have been no victims – before it could be examined.
16. The fact that photographic evidence shows that a hole created in the Pentagon was much smaller than a hole created by a Boeing 757would be.
17. The fact that photographs show that there were no remains of a large airliner in front of the crash site, even though, given the small entrance hole, not all of the Boeing 757 could have gone inside.
18. The fact that witnesses also reported seeing no remains of a large airliner inside the Pentagon.
19. The fact that the west wing, far from being the most likely part of the Pentagon for terrorists to target, was the least likely, as well as technically difficult to hit.
20. The fact that any non-military plane, not having a transponder sending out a “friendly” signal, would have been automatically shot down by the Pentagon’s battery of missiles.
21. The extreme unlikelihood that a hijacked 757 could have flown undetected through American airspace, especially toward the Pentagon, for some 40 minutes. Why ere surveillance tapes, taken by a hotel across from the Pentagon quickly seized by the FBI, and their contents kept from the public?
22. The evidence that the Bush administration lied about not having shot down Flight 93.
23. The fact that President Bush gave the impression upon his arrival at the Sarasota school, even after a telephone conversation with Condoleezza Rice, that he was unaware that two more airliners, beyond the one that had crashed into the North Tower-WTC, had been hijacked.
24. The fact that Bush, after being told about the attack on the South Tower, did not act like a commander in chief who was surprised to learn that the United States was suffering the greatest terrorist attack in its history.
25. The fact that Bush and his entourage, including his Secret Service detail, showed no sign of fear that they would be attacked while in Florida, even though at that time they – assuming the truth of the official account – would have known neither how many planes had been hijacked, nor what the terrorists’ targets were.
26. The multiple denial, by Bush administration officials that they had had any idea that planes might be used as weapons in a terrorist attack against the United States, even though such knowledge was widespread – partly because of warnings the Bush administration itself had received that terrorists were in fact planning such an attack.
27. The fact that the FBI must have had specific advance knowledge of the attacks, given (a) its confiscation of a film of the attack on the Pentagon within five minutes, (b) its confiscation of student files from Florida flight schools within 18 hours, and (c) the reported testimony of FBI agents (to David Schippers and the New American [John Birch Society publication]) that they knew the dates and targets of the New York attacks months in advance.
28. The repeated denial by Bush administration officials that they had received any specific advance knowledge about the attacks of 9/11, contradicting strong evidence to the contrary, including that provided by the timely coincidental purchases of enormous amounts of “Put Options” on United Airlines, American Airlines, and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. The Bush administration refused to reveal the identities of those who purchased the options.
29. The evidence that although Osama bin Laden was officially America’s “most wanted” criminal, he was treated by an American surgeon and visited by a CIA agent in an American hospital in Dubai two months prior to 9/11. The bin Laden family has a 20 year history of a close relationship with the Bush family.
30. The evidence that local FBI agents in Minnesota, New York, and Chicago were prevented by FBI headquarters from carrying out investigations that could have uncovered the plot.
31. The harassment and demotion of DIA agent Julie Sirrs after she brought back information about a plan in Afghanistan to assassinate Ahmad Massood.
32. The evidence that the Bush administration had already determined by July of 2001 that it would attack Afghanistan “by the middle of October at the latest, “combined with the fact that the attacks of 9/11. By occurring on that date, gave the US military sufficient preparation time to begin its assault on October 7.
33. The evidence that during the “Hunt for Bin Laden” after 9/11, he and his Al Qaeda forces were repeatedly allowed to escape.
34. The evidence that the Bush administration sought in multiple ways to conceal the connections between “9/11” Pakistan’s ISI( their CIA). The US, through ISI was used to funnel money to the Taliban during the USSR invasion of Afghanistan.
35. The fact that the FBI, the Justice Department, and Air Force all refused to answer questions about the report that many of the (alleged) hijackers had received training at US flight schools.
36. The multiple reasons to doubt the official conspiracy theory’s tale of “Arab-Muslim hijackers”
37. The firing and subsequent gagging of FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds after she reported that a “9/11” related investigation was being sabotaged by a spy.
38. The fact that while people such as Julie Sirrs and Sibel Edmonds have been punished, there have been no reports of punishment for anyone who acted incompetently or obstructively in relation to “9/11”; whether in the FAA, the FBI, the CIA, the DIA, the NSA, the Justice Department, the White House, NORAD, the Pentagon, or the US military more generally.
39. The fact that the Bush administration has not revealed the identities of those who purchased the put options on UA, AA, and Morgan Stanley three days before “9/11”.
40. The fact that the White House repeatedly obstructed the attempts of the “9/11” Commission – as feeble as they appear to have been – to learn how the attacks of “9/11” could have succeeded.

One would have to ask the “Big Question”: If the Bush administration was concerned about transparency, integrity, Patriotism[means do what I say and agree], and the needs of the majority of Americans, why would they work so steadfastly to suppress any investigations or uncovering of the truth?